>The idea that the the current economic order is the most efficient is... idealistic Nope. It's a fact that the current world economy is the most efficient yet

>The idea that the the current economic order is the most efficient is... idealistic Nope. It's a fact that the current world economy is the most efficient yet seen. Imagination is not implementation. There remains plenty to discuss on how to do it better going forward. >The global economy is about expanding the wealth and consumption of the.01% while maintaining a standard of living well enough that the next 20% won't murder them and guard then from the bottom 80% Not worth arguing with it goes nowhere interesting, the gloabl economy isn't designed. Billionaire influence is quite limited for we rail that it exceed our own. Whatever. And yet somehow, despite what you think and I think about the global economy structure the bottom %80, hell the bottom 20% are objectively much better off in terms of food and health than Mill's time. While the sheer numbers of people have expoded. We've never had so many in absolute numbers and perecentage lifted out of sickness and poverty. That isn't nothing. Continue hating billionaires by all means. I do. >We're well well beyond this capability. So by design or accident even you acknowledge it has "worked" for those who would otherwise be sick and hungry. >Westerners need to eat less meat, waste less electricity (more fuel for fertilizer etc). Maybe? Why not? This has absolutely nothing to do with feeding 7billion and treating their diseases. Really. Nothing at all. >Rishi Sunak Who? Be careful whose leadership you follow. I somehow doubt you'd accept him as an authority on anything you didn't like the sound of. Myself, I sure wouldn't on anything at all... Billionaire by marriage or not adds nothing to the quality or thought.