I think the down-votes are unjustified. I guess nobody is seriously using Arch as a server OS in production. So this is kind of comparing apples to oranges, su

I think the down-votes are unjustified. I guess nobody is seriously using Arch as a server OS in production. So this is kind of comparing apples to oranges, sure. But Arch's documentation is indeed one of the best around! I'm a die hard Debian user since forever but for the last years I don't even bother to try to find anything in the abysmally bad Debian docs. I go straight to the Arch wiki (or to the Gentoo one for even more in depth docu on internal aspects of Linux software). Contrary to that I've almost never found anything of value in the RedHat docs (that wasn't RedHat specific). If the Arch wiki would expand on some things that are more related to running servers in production it would be the Linux documentation. The overall quality and general applicability of Arch's docu is already unparalleled, imho. Reminder, to stay true to the trope: I'm not using Arch Linux (as such) for anything.