3 ms·
Not true. Consent has nothing to do with cookies. If you look at what the ePrivacy Directive article 5.3. says, it's pretty clear: "Member States shall ensure
by jussivee 4y ago
Not true. Consent has nothing to do with cookies. If you look at what the ePrivacy Directive article 5.3. says, it's pretty clear:
"Member States shall ensure that the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user is only allowed on condition that the subscriber or user concerned has given his or her consent, ... "
So even Fathom, and other analytics tools that use browser fingerprinting or similar methods require consent.
And also, the whole no cookie, no consent -mantra does not respect user privacy. In some ways, browser fingerprinting is even worse because that's much harder for an average user to block than cookies.
- the_gipsy 4y agoIt might be true, if the stored data is truly anonymized, as they seem to not be storing any data on the browser. There is a fuzzy line somewhere between access-logs and user-tracking. Personally I think that at that point, one should just stop loading analytic scripts and stick to server-side access-log analytic toolg like goaccess.io.
- PinkWitch 4y agoWhat about Plausible?