4 ms·
For a genius, yes. For most people it is important to get help and cooperate a lot. Also notable is that this reads differently after controversy surrounding Ja
by Frummy 4y ago
For a genius, yes. For most people it is important to get help and cooperate a lot. Also notable is that this reads differently after controversy surrounding James Watson
- hyperhello 4y agoDisregarding others generates controversy.
- oifjsidjf 4y agoThis is a destructive way to go about life. Imagine saying something like this to a kid or a young adult: you will make him think he is unworthy and that "it's not for him", thus destroying any potential he has because of your closemindedness.
- Frummy 4y agoWell, that’s assumptive. People will naturally work in whatever manner suits them best. Some kids study alone some kids study in groups.
- lupire 4y agoMost comfortable is not the same as most effective. Study skills is something to learn too. Many a fiercely proud individual hurt themself by refusing to collaborate and then wasting time being stuck.
- frozencell 4y ago> Some kids study alone some kids study in groups. Extremely simplified view.
- lupire 4y agoFeynman didn't oppose cooperation. The advice is to disregard naysayers who tell you your effort is going in a wrong direction or is doomed. But yes, it works best if you are a genius who is likely to be right. But also, analysis paralysis hurts the non genius more, because the genius can make more progress, which is motivating, in the time that the non genius gives up and tries something different. For the non genius, though, discouragement is in the form "you can't do this", not "it's a bad idea in.l general".
- SilverBirch 4y agoYeah, it's kind of funny reading this. Disregard others. By which we of course mean disregard Rosalind Franklin's foundational work on the structure of DNA.