6 ms·
The American chip industry’s $1.5T meltdown
- bee_rider 4y agoSince the semiconductor industry is known to be boom/bust, I don't know why the US government doesn't have an official, automatic countercyclical spending policy... Micron down 20% YOY? Surely some supercomputer centers could use RAM...
- neogodless 4y agoPreviously discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33244767 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33244767 2022 October 18 (7 days ago) 285+ points, 679+ comments
- adventured 4y ago> Half a year later the dreams look nightmarish. Demand for silicon appears to be falling as quickly as it had risen during the pandemic. The article is remarkably ignorant of history. Nightmarish is a absurd exaggeration. With the semiconductor industry, you must invest heavily during any downturn to properly reap the rewards during the inevitable good years. Rinse and repeat across decades. > So far this year more than $1.5trn has been wiped from the combined market value of American-listed semiconductor companies Which has only somewhat to do with the semiconductor industry and everything to do with the hyper overvaluation in nearly all asset classes thanks to the Fed's prior, prolonged, low rate program. Just ask the cloud stocks (smashed), or eg Microsoft (which all by itself is missing ~$720 billion off its market cap high). Tesla has been slashed in half, it's missing nearly $700 billion all by itself too. The examples of market cap destruction in the stock market are plentiful. > In late September Micron, an Idaho-based maker of memory chips, reported a 20% year-on-year fall in quarterly sales. Oh no, what ever will Micron do. It's a true nightmare. /s They have been around for 44 years and are doing quite well. Micron understands market swings, they have lived through many of them. So have AMD and Intel. This article is one big click-bait, scaremongering nothingburger. The only thing worth considering at this moment for the US semiconductor industry, is how much more should be invested than has already been allocated. The US Government should probably put tens of billions of dollars more into the pot for advancing semiconductor R&D, training labor, partnerships with universities, et al. > It is enough to keep you awake in terror at night. No. You can be certain that this article is a particularly wonderful indicator of the exact opposite as to what is going to actually happen. ~6-10 years from now the US semiconductor industry will be stronger than ever and will still tower over China's badly flailing efforts at forcing a semi industry into existence.
- kevin_thibedeau 4y agoMicron is the only domestic US DRAM manufacturer. They are a critical defense asset and will never be allowed to fail.
- petra 4y agoIt's even better than that. In the long term, the chip ban will greatly reduce China's AI/HPC capabilities. And those technologies are critical for leading in most areas - science, r&d, robotics and manufacturing and others. This would have the effect of letting the west, to become the economic leader again. I'm sure it's a good future for the Semi companies.
- legitster 4y agoAren't these comparing different product segments? Okay, consumer processor chips are down from their work-from-home/bitcoin boom. But I was under the impression that these new factories were focusing on industrial inputs - microcontrollers and such.
- ummonk 4y agoThe article mentions that carmakers and the like stockpiled a bunch of chips during the Covid shortages, so there is reduced demand from them now while they work through their stockpiles.
- bdamm 4y agoThey've been claiming microchip shortage for the last two years. Didn't sound like a stockpile. Ford and Tesla both had production slowdowns or product regressions specifically due to difficulties getting certain chips, and surely others. What's your source?
- rnk 4y agoThis article seems pretty questionable because they combined very different situations together. There's no doubt that car companies have big backlogs from shortages of parts needed for final assembly of vehicles, in large part needing semiconductors. Tesla has mentioned this, rivian is another but legacy auto also sees this. But the article conflates possible oversupply in different market segments like cloud, GPUs seem to be in oversupply too says Nvidia even though that won't help car makers. It's just a terrible article.
- mdm_ 4y agoI don't understand how that can be true. I put a deposit on a new Hyundai last month and Hyundai Canada is telling me it won't even be built until February 2023, specifically citing chip shortages.
- throw8383833jj 4y ago
- tester756 4y agoSemico stocks are basically on discount now
- wing-_-nuts 4y agoHonestly? The world's chipmaking should be more decentralized simply from a national security perspective. One needs to only look at the effects of sanctions on russia, once one of the world's preeminent superpowers, now lacks access to chips to such a degree that they're repurposing hugely expensive surface to air (s3-400) missiles for ground attack and relying on iranian drones for precision attacks. The fact that china could reduce 63% of the world's chip making capacity to rubble at a whim is a strategic threat to the global economy. This is one area where we could absolutely use some redundant supply, even at the cost of taxpayer dollars.
- boxed 4y agoAutomatic car speed cameras are being raided here in Sweden to be sold on the black market to Russia for use in military components. That speaks to their level of need!
- nostromo 4y agoIt's notable that this is the primary argument for farm subsidies -- often pilloried on HN. When it comes to food, energy, water and critical tech, it makes sense to control your supply, even if it comes at a premium.
- mcphage 4y ago> this is the primary argument for farm subsidies -- often pilloried on HN I don't think there's a strong objection to farm subsidies on their own. The complaints mostly revolve around (a) the food that gets subsidized is food that makes us unhealthy, and (b) the politicians pushing farm subsidies are also against other forms of government assistance, and refuse to recognize the inconsistency in these attitudes.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zamalek 4y ago> even at the cost of taxpayer dollars. And not even a major cost. 50bn sounds like a lot to a layperson (and makes for great clickbait). We spend 700bn on military every year. It's more jobs, especially different jobs. It's fewer imports (possibly not more exports with this isolationist trend we're seeing globally). There's more trust in the supply chain. Ths article/propaganda is very short-sighted, as per usual.
- marricks 4y agoWasn't this foretold during the chip shortage by most articles written about it? That there'd be a down turn and everyone would have over invested in building new plants? Even worse because the fed is terrified of inflation / higher labour costs the US government is basically causing the melt down.
- m00x 4y agoYes, Toyota actually saw it coming and stockpiled a ton of semiconductors, which allowed them to manufacture normally way past others.
- thrown_22 4y agoNo, this is the other side of that hill. Toyota saw the shortage coming. Now we're seeing a glut that will take a decade to work itself out and result in another shortage.
- singingwolfboy 4y agohttps://archive.ph/Du5aK https://archive.ph/Du5aK
- ChrisArchitect 4y ago[dupe] Plenty of discussion over here 8 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33244767 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33244767
- LordDragonfang 4y agoIs flagging appropriate for (recent) reposts like this? The submission guidelines don't seem to explicitly say so, but there's no "downvote" for posts.
- ChrisArchitect 4y agonah, just highlighting to readers that there's a whole recent thread with discussion and this isn't fresh news is all we can do really. Mods will clean up things if it's closer to original posting date but a week out I dunno.
- animitronix 4y agoYet we still can't find raspberry pis anywhere. I call BS on demand being down.