4 ms·
I don't know, I'd say "one of the worst". To be truly "worst", I'd say you'd have to feature in the textbooks of students of English contract law. See, for ex
by traceroute66 4y ago
I don't know, I'd say "one of the worst".
To be truly "worst", I'd say you'd have to feature in the textbooks of students of English contract law.
See, for example, Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company[1] which is a famous example used in every single textbook.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_Co https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_...
- amelius 4y agoHow about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi_Number_Fever https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi_Number_Fever > Pepsi Number Fever, also known as the 349 incident, was a promotion held by PepsiCo in the Philippines in 1992, which led to riots and the deaths of at least five people. Somehow, the company and the brand still exist.
- bsjaux628 4y agoFrom the article, 3 victims were PepsiCo workers and 2 were a teacher and a student that were caught in the blast of a pipe bomb thrown at a PepsiCo truck. How is the company to blame for the action of a mob of idiots and anarchists?
- amelius 4y agoBy provoking mass anger? > About 22,000 people took legal action against PepsiCo; at least 689 civil suits and 5,200 criminal complaints for fraud and deception were filed.
- tedunangst 4y agoNope, I'm still blaming the bomber for the bomb.
- thatguy0900 4y agoThat's what they should do, sue. Throwing grenades at warehouses accomplishes nothing. At least go for the ceos if you must do that.
- ghaff 4y agoAh the opening of The Paper Chase film. Well worth watching by the way if you haven't.