3 ms·

>These models are capable of generating photorealistic child pornography. That's why they're not being released. Is this true, have you seen it or just heard a

>These models are capable of generating photorealistic child pornography. That's why they're not being released. Is this true, have you seen it or just heard about it? because what I seen is that the AI is bad, the faces are wrong, the fingers are wrong,t he hands and legs are often connected wrong, you can get very often more then 2 legs more then 5 fingers. I seen a community that focus on waifus, this images are not realistic, are obvious carton, animation styles and similar images were created already with digital painting tools. I also did not seen any porn scene generated by AI, I don't think the model was trained on porn scenes so at best you will get puritans removing breasts from the models, including art , but for sure I want to see how they will ensure that the AI can only generate male nipples and not women ones.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
dudeinjapan 4y ago
...I think you've stumbled onto a new a fetish subculture here.
- simion314 4y ago
  not sure what fetish you mean exactly, but is your answer on topic ? You can retrain SD without NSFW images, is this enough? I suspect not, because what if Timy in his basement trains SD with the face of X and the naked body of Y and then makes a nude image ? You know what makes rational/logic sense ? |Follow the money, an open source model like SD makes proprietary ones like OpenAI and googles lose ton of money, like a giant pile of money Californian billionaires will lose , so they use their money to create drama.
throwaway382938 4y ago
> Is this true, have you seen it or just heard about it? I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatomy. > I also did not seen any porn scene generated by AI There are user made SD models trained on porn available for months now.
- simion314 4y ago
  >I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatom You mean a child with no clothes? is that CP? there are painting and art of children with no clothers, or you mean you seen sexual acts too? Since I never seen it with adults , AFAIK SD was not trained with porn scenes , at best you might get realistic breasts but not get realistic sexual organs and add on top the low resolution. >There are user made SD models trained on porn available for months now. So you would also have an issue even if SD was 100% SFW because some dude in his basement would train it to generate breasts and dicks and then combine it with SD that can generate faces, so SD should not exist ? People were drawing porn stuff digitally for decades, now an AI will do the same, maybe you need a better case , CP is still illegal, Google and Apple will snitch on you also so WTF is this hysteria ? In fact tbe cause of this CP and Google stuff I avoided experimenting with Google colab SD, the AI might paint a monstrosity but Google AI might think is CP and close my accounts. Also you feailled to respond to my accusation of missing evidence, missing evidence that drawing porn or CP ever caused victims, or more victims then say sending you kid to church.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

dudeinjapan 4y ago

...I think you've stumbled onto a new a fetish subculture here.

simion314 4y ago
not sure what fetish you mean exactly, but is your answer on topic ? You can retrain SD without NSFW images, is this enough? I suspect not, because what if Timy in his basement trains SD with the face of X and the naked body of Y and then makes a nude image ? You know what makes rational/logic sense ? |Follow the money, an open source model like SD makes proprietary ones like OpenAI and googles lose ton of money, like a giant pile of money Californian billionaires will lose , so they use their money to create drama.

throwaway382938 4y ago

> Is this true, have you seen it or just heard about it? I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatomy. > I also did not seen any porn scene generated by AI There are user made SD models trained on porn available for months now.

simion314 4y ago
>I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatom You mean a child with no clothes? is that CP? there are painting and art of children with no clothers, or you mean you seen sexual acts too? Since I never seen it with adults , AFAIK SD was not trained with porn scenes , at best you might get realistic breasts but not get realistic sexual organs and add on top the low resolution. >There are user made SD models trained on porn available for months now. So you would also have an issue even if SD was 100% SFW because some dude in his basement would train it to generate breasts and dicks and then combine it with SD that can generate faces, so SD should not exist ? People were drawing porn stuff digitally for decades, now an AI will do the same, maybe you need a better case , CP is still illegal, Google and Apple will snitch on you also so WTF is this hysteria ? In fact tbe cause of this CP and Google stuff I avoided experimenting with Google colab SD, the AI might paint a monstrosity but Google AI might think is CP and close my accounts. Also you feailled to respond to my accusation of missing evidence, missing evidence that drawing porn or CP ever caused victims, or more victims then say sending you kid to church.