4 ms·
Paris, Dublin (radar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland%E2%80%93NATO_relations#Defending_Irish_airspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland%E2%80%93NATO_r
by downvotetruth 4y ago
Paris, Dublin (radar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland%E2%80%93NATO_relations#Defending_Irish_airspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland%E2%80%93NATO_relations...), Madrid, Toyko & Australia not being targeted make it that much more unrealistic. Even if those were hit any other remaining urban area would have its population get dragged in for peace keeping & humanitarian clean up.
- anonymousDan 4y agoWhy would Dublin be targeted?
- Aeolun 4y agoEveryone hates Dublin. That said, I don’t think it would be targeted since it’s existence is a greater detriment to the enemy than it’s destruction.
- pb7 4y agoI laughed. But if you’re going for maximum economic damage, a capital whose economic value is largely in tax avoidance wouldn’t be that high up on the list since in a post-apocalyptic world, taxes will be the least of everyone’s worries.
- gsatic 4y agoThen why wasn't Tokyo nuked?
- pb7 4y agoI made another comment agreeing that this simulation is overly simplistic in multiple ways. It‘s basically a simulation of US and Russian nukes with European soil as the first strike. There’s no way other nuclear powers would sit idly by.
- tkiolp4 4y agoJapan was already hit by nuclear weapons. Let them be at peace in the next war.
- ashwagary 4y agoI'm sure North Korea and many Asian nations think Japan didn't pay a heavy enough price for their attempts at imperialism.
- Aeolun 4y agoI’m not sure anything is gained by nuking Tokyo? I guess you could smash a few US airbases here, but it’s anyone’s guess if they contain nuclear warheads.
- neuronic 4y agoThere are definitely some cities that would just look the same after a series of nuclear strikes.