The word "vaccine" appears nowhere in the linked article. As for your off topic post, if you were concerned with the data I would think your first step would b

The word "vaccine" appears nowhere in the linked article. As for your off topic post, if you were concerned with the data I would think your first step would be to verify if the data was real. Your second step would be to understand the context in which the data was collected and reported. Your third step would probably be to attempt to establish a baseline of how many reports we'd expect if the vaccine were a placebo. Even one of those anti-vaccer web sites has a disclaimer that says "Reports are not proof of causality." Which seems to hint that you misunderstand what the data is reporting.