3 ms·
I like the USB-C connector but wondering if there is a better way to handle the ever expanding number of different cable types that are used with this connector
by augustuspolius 4y ago
I like the USB-C connector but wondering if there is a better way to handle the ever expanding number of different cable types that are used with this connector (SuperSpeed, Thunderbolt, etc).
Switching to USB-C reduced the number of different cables I have at home but almost equally increased the number of different types of USB-C I have. Some work with my monitor, some don’t, some charge, some don’t charge, it’s a mess.
- chrisseaton 4y agoIf you want to, you can buy all 40 Gbps 240 W Thunderbolt 4 Pro USB-C cables for all use-cases, but they're literally like $100 a metre, so that'd be insane and why instead there's a variety of cheaper cables for different use-cases.
- wmf 4y agoA USB-C 3.0 100W cable is more like $20 and does everything other than Thunderbolt. The OP must have really bad luck.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- augustuspolius 4y agoExactly - it's too expensive and at this point I am not sure how future proof this investment would be. Are we going to have a new USB-C cable in a year's time that my next monitor will require?.. Edit: different devices add even more to this confusion. My MacBook Pro M1 is refusing to work with a 4K USB-C monitor even when using a Thunderbolt 4 cable. LG is convinced that it should be working just fine.
- Dylan16807 4y agoWhere the heck did you get a cable that can't charge? Unless you mean it can't go over 60 watts?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- augustuspolius 4y agoSorry, I meant data transfer+charging at the same time.
- seba_dos1 4y agoEvery cable is suitable for at least USB 2.0 data transfer and 60W PD charging. Fully-featured cables get USB 3.0 data (at varying speed) and e-marked cables get >= 60W charging (100W or even higher with more recent PD revs). Thunderbolt (and USB4) has its own requirements. If the above isn't true for your particular cable, it's either broken or what you're trying to do isn't specified by USB-C but rather some proprietary tech instead, in which case, blame your device vendor.
- augustuspolius 4y agoInteresting. I was testing this with a 4K USB-C monitor connected to MacBook Pro M1. Charging was not working due to "insufficient power". I am trying to keep up with these spec details for a cable that is often marketed as just USB-C... it feels like an unnecessary cognitive load.
- seba_dos1 4y agoUnless you need to go above 60W, a cable does not have any way to influence negotiated charging profile at all.