3 ms·
Are you suggesting that an American city could socialize a large chunk of its private real estate with the stroke of a pen or that landlords are waiting for som
by kasey_junk 4y ago
Are you suggesting that an American city could socialize a large chunk of its private real estate with the stroke of a pen or that landlords are waiting for some legal change to turn their office/retail space into homeless shelters and needle exchanges?
- AdrianB1 4y agoI'm not sure if that was sarcasm (especially the part with needle exchange), but it is San Francisco so yes, it could.
- water554 4y agoI would rather free housing go to people in need who work for a living
- whimsicalism 4y agoBoston has done it, I worked with an affordable housing group that worked on this stuff. The difference was these were largely undeveloped lots, not office buildings.
- kasey_junk 4y agoThat seems like a big distinction…
- bdw5204 4y agoThe 5th Amendment of the US Constitution specifically permits eminent domain with "just compensation" so yes an American city could take a large chunk of its private real estate under eminent domain and put it to "public use". Converting vacant office buildings into homeless shelters would absolutely count as a "public use".
- kasey_junk 4y agoBuying some of the most expensive real estate in the world with “just compensation” seems like it’s more than a stroke of a pen. Further, the court cases this will bring will take _forever_ because one side will be extremely well funded and the other side will be the city of San Francisco. Not the stroke of a pen.
- kjkjadksj 4y agoWhy not? Theyve laid waste to hundreds of thousands of homes to build freeways with a stroke of a pen before.