4 ms·
Yeah, I agree that double precision makes sense for modeling a very large system in data, but I've never bought the need for double precision when it comes to r
by teawrecks 4y ago
Yeah, I agree that double precision makes sense for modeling a very large system in data, but I've never bought the need for double precision when it comes to rendering a small subsection of it. Unless you have an incredibly high resolution display, single precision should be enough.
- corysama 4y agoYou are correct that you can render a small section of a very large data set by re-centering your origin of the data sent to GPU around a small subsection. So, now the question becomes "But, do you really want to?" > Overall, we are quite happy with how this solution turned out. We think it is the closest to "just works" that we can get. I think this is the crux of it. The performance penalty is very small and the convenience factor is very high. But, now I want to know what they do with the positions of lights in the scene... Likely transformed to view space regardless for deferred rendering, I'd guess.