4 ms·
Is it that much crazier than previously, when a movie was shot on film, scanned to a digital intermediary, then printed back onto film for distribution? EDIT:
by morley 4y ago
Is it that much crazier than previously, when a movie was shot on film, scanned to a digital intermediary, then printed back onto film for distribution?
EDIT: Now that I've read up on Greig Fraser's reasoning, it makes a lot more sense for Dune! https://ymcinema.com/2021/12/03/dune-was-shot-on-alexa-lf-transferred-to-35mm-film-then-scanned-back-to-digital/ https://ymcinema.com/2021/12/03/dune-was-shot-on-alexa-lf-tr...
- Dylan16807 4y ago> Is it that much crazier than previously, when a movie was shot on film, scanned to a digital intermediary, then printed back onto film for distribution? Yes. They did that because they didn't have digital equipment suitable for cameras and projectors. This is much crazier.
- Synaesthesia 4y agoThe reason is supposedly to achieve a softness in the image. I’m sure that could have been achieved with a video filter.