3 ms·
Yeah it's often pretty obvious that a paper extends / is incremental on a previous body of work (maybe the same code, maybe same dataset) such that it could onl
by bpodgursky 4y ago
Yeah it's often pretty obvious that a paper extends / is incremental on a previous body of work (maybe the same code, maybe same dataset) such that it could only have come from one lab.
- hedora 4y agoYeah, but good CS conferences have diverse reviewer pools, including ones from industry or different subdisciplines. Such reviewers often haven't heard of the lab, or paid attention to which grants are currently funded, the movement of students into postdoc positions at other labs, etc, etc.