3 ms·
Obviously not, because candidates are generally in a worse position than the company they are interviewing to. There's nothing to balance here, regulation must
by 9dev 4y ago
Obviously not, because candidates are generally in a worse position than the company they are interviewing to. There's nothing to balance here, regulation must hit corporations and protect employees.
- dominotw 4y agowhat worse position. Pretty sure the engineers quoted in the article will do just fine. Why does govt need to 'hit corporations' for privileged FB employees making 500k/yr+
- lumost 4y agoIf FaceBook does it, then the shady startup offering "30k + fake options" to new employees can do it too. FaceBook is setting an awful precedent.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 9dev 4y agoThat's because Facebook doesn't just employ privileged engineers making big money, but an army of staff that won't do just fine if their employer fucks them over. Neither you, nor me, and certainly no public service officer can draw the line. That's why the government should force businesses to treat all employees with a modicum of respect, and prevent corporations from doing stuff like Facebook did here.
- im3w1l 4y agoThey would have been privileged FB employees. But with the offer cancelled maybe they are not so privileged anymore? They could be new grads that never were on the gravy train.