3 ms·
Reasons can be many just some ideas: - Probably because they try to avoid needing to given an press statement/explanation to some more official entity. - The
by dathinab 4y ago
Reasons can be many just some ideas:
- Probably because they try to avoid needing to given an press statement/explanation to some more official entity.
- The whole meta verse could be going not so grate.
- Advertisement might not be going that well for meta either.
- Facebook is mostly used by older people and at least where I live most of the people have zombie Facebook accounts (i.e. they have one check in once a week due to family/old people connections and don't use it any further then that, so they might count as active users but are de-facto not)
- There had been a lot of whispers going around about people being unhappy about how some of the big tech companies kill competition by buying small startups and then silently dropping them after some time. This can count as not fully legal anti-competitive behavior in some situations so they can't just fire the people they brought, which might have contributed to them overgrowing.
- Silicon Valley has IMHO overpaid developers in average (and _only_ in average, and specific to SV) now that they have for years effectively killed most competition in one way or another (bought up, talent starvation, etc.) they might feel that it's time to lower wages for which they first have to get right of many existing contracts. What is better suited for this then a unstable economy where 1) they have an excuse to fire people 2) they can press lower wages because people are frightened and care more about having a ok paying job then potentially getting a greatly paying job.
- I feel some of the big tech companies work rather inefficient, sure they do have problems only people at their scale have, but then some small dev teams can sometimes compete with their products if you ignore that (and ignore network effect).
- Maybe they want to hide some fishy lay of schemes about not how many but which people they lay of. Potentially outright conflicting with employee protection laws in some states.
uh, I guess this are all wild rumors I have, in the end we will have to wait and see.
- reaperducer 4y agoProbably because they try to avoid needing to given an press statement/explanation to some more official entity. There are both federal and state laws that require companies to let the government know if they fire a certain number of people. Trying to dodge a law that apples to every other company sounds like par for the course for Facebook and the other SV companies that aspire to emulate it.
- dathinab 4y agoThat's the thing with quite layoffs. You for example could convince people to quit instead of being fired obfuscating the actual size and patterns of the layoffs. And I mean especially Facebook is well known for not caring about low as long as they are not forced to.
- pwdisswordfish9 4y ago> - The whole meta verse could be going not so grate. It was pretty grating so far…
- perfecthjrjth 4y agoIt is Facebook, who broke the wage-suppression cartel collusion between Apple, Google, Intuit, Adobe, etc. Love to see how FB layoffs can play out in terms of ToC at other places.