5 ms·
Well concrete is not waterproof (generally) so they are technically also using the form as waterproofing. It's pretty clever IMO but you'd need rebar at the ver
by booi 4y ago
Well concrete is not waterproof (generally) so they are technically also using the form as waterproofing. It's pretty clever IMO but you'd need rebar at the very least for any structure worth building...
- netfl0 4y agoIt seems like a high amount of complexity. Lots that can go wrong. I’ll take tyvek and wood :)
- john_the_writer 4y agoConcrete is also super bad for the environment. Wood is renewable and far easier to get locally.
- newaccount2021 4y ago
- retrobrandcool 4y ago[dead]
- retrobrandcool 4y ago[dead]
- teeray 4y agoInsulation might be nice once it gets chilly.
- ewzimm 4y agoConcrete construction without rebar is more durable and worth bringing back. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
- nradov 4y agoHow well does it handle earthquakes?
- midoridensha 4y agoIt doesn't.
- ewzimm 4y agoEarthquake resistance is increased by strengthening the concrete, but it mainly depends on how the structure is built, not just the shape but additoinal measures used to strengthen the structure. We've been stuck on rebar for so long that research on alternatives has stalled, but there are interesting opportunities and developments in that area. For example, basalt fiber and bamboo have potential. Sustainable, innovative building structures that don't require energy-intensive and corrosive steel will depend on a convergence of strengthening technologies and archtectural techniques, maybe even including ones like described in the original article. Considering all the environmental and social problems we have with modern housing and construction, this is a prime area for innovation! https://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/two-natural-rebar-alternatives-for-concrete_o https://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/two-natural-reb...
- monkeywork 4y agoIsn't there a massive difference in wall thickness between what the Romans did and what we do today?
- ewzimm 4y agoModern uses of Roman concrete go beyond what the Romans did. We can create completely different types of structures using the same principles. Here's an example of recent developments in research: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210113090920.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210113090920.h...
- adwn 4y agoConcrete without rebar lacks tensile strength, and Roman concrete is no different. When using materials with insufficient tensile strength, you're severely restricted in the kinds of structures you can build. That's why Roman buildings used so many domes and arches, and why they were massive. Practical Engineering has a good video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL0BB2PRY7k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL0BB2PRY7k