3 ms·
But if you if you spread the image in a forum of haters, you may incite someone to kill that person. That's why there are laws against harassment. The danger is
by TuringTest 4y ago
But if you if you spread the image in a forum of haters, you may incite someone to kill that person. That's why there are laws against harassment. The danger is not the existence of an image, it is the act of communication that has consequences.
- chii 4y agohate crime is already a crime. If someone were to want to incite hate, they could do it today just as easily as a hypothetical future where an AI generated image is readily available. So the problem isn't the AI, it's the forum of haters. Restricting AI usage, in the hope of not having someone use it to incite hate is too roundabout a way to achieve any significant result, while everybody pays a high cost (of not being free to use such an AI as they see fit).
- BoxOfRain 4y agoI quite like the concept of information hazards for reasoning about these kinds of risk.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoThey say music can alter moods and talk to you. Well, can it load a gun up for you and cock it too? Well, if it can, then the next time you assault a dude, just tell the judge it was my fault and I'll get sued!