4 ms·
There is an obvious difference: the right to keep and bear arms is enshrined into the constitution under the regulation, "shall not be infringed". There is no s
by hellojesus 4y ago
There is an obvious difference: the right to keep and bear arms is enshrined into the constitution under the regulation, "shall not be infringed". There is no such right for vehicles.
- the_gipsy 4y agoFirst off, the constitution can and should be updated. Second, the "right to bear arms" is not without limits already. Third, guns will never be eliminated completely, just regulated more strictly.
- hellojesus 4y agoYes, the constitution can be updated via ammendment. My point was that, at present, one is constitutionally protected and the other is not. Also the current limits on arms are all unconstitutional. There's no question about it. But there is a whole host of things that are unconstitutional that don't seem to matter anyway, like social security and minimum wage.