3 ms·
Surveillance generally means a loss of the moral high ground, and an indication a culture has entered a transitional political period. Sorry to continue the cy
by joe_the_user 4y ago
Surveillance generally means a loss of the moral high ground, and an indication a culture has entered a transitional political period.
Sorry to continue the cynicism but what's a modern state that doesn't engage in surveillance? Here in the US, phones have been bugged by the cops at times since phones existed.
And I remember in the Art of War, Sun Tzu advised his reader to essentially surveil the enemy as much as possible. Which is to say states have employed secret agents against the enemy and employed them against their own once the state grew large enough to view the people as yet another potential enemy.
The one way your statement pans out is states whose surveillance becomes obvious tend to be weakened to some degree.
And I'm personally against surveillance, I'm not trying to justify it.
- Joel_Mckay 4y agoOne observation is the lack of personal rights protecting against host-state whims is a cautionary tale repeated throughout history, and may manifest in any number of political systems. Another theory points out that democratic republics are fundamentally vulnerable to regime changes, and inevitably develops an achilles' heel that manifests as its citizens can no longer distinguish basic facts from their own fictional narratives or media. I doubt Sun Tzu fully recognized that perpetually testing fate by harassing random people was a poor strategy for survival. =)