3 ms·
The law shows you which companies act in bad faith (ostensibly all of them). The companies choose whether to continue acting badly (but having to tell you, if
by pbhjpbhj 4y ago
The law shows you which companies act in bad faith (ostensibly all of them).
The companies choose whether to continue acting badly (but having to tell you, if you're in the EU); or to act kindly and so have no need to inform you they're doing something malicious.
There is already a "do not track" setting in browsers. Companies choose whether to annoy you or not.
- whywhywhywhy 4y agoThey could have done the exact same thing by punishing the same people who don’t do the cookie popup but with do not track. As you say people don’t comply with it yet you think they’ll comply with the popup. But instead they had to make a new thing that’s just ended up being abused. The face sites can even force you to wait a few seconds if you don’t opt in is insane. There is no reason why it had to be a dialog, it’s just an arbitrary choice by career bureaucrats that now we have to experience at least once a day.
- BiteCode_dev 4y agoThe law says nothing about a pop up, it requires informed consent. The corporations choose to use the pop up and to ignore the header to comply. Again you are orienting your anger in the wrong direction.