4 ms·
Hm, is that an ethical way to approach ethics? I think it's problematic, honestly.
by civilized 4y ago
Hm, is that an ethical way to approach ethics? I think it's problematic, honestly.
- bpodgursky 4y agoThe field of bioethics would never pass an IRB.
- kelseyfrog 4y agoAny alternatives?
- civilized 4y agoBalanced consideration of positives and negatives rather than a focus on only negatives which is so strained and obsessive, it seems to be a professional requirement?
- kelseyfrog 4y agoWhat do you know about metaethics?
- civilized 4y agoEnough to say that only looking at risks is not an ethical way to approach ethics.
- kelseyfrog 4y agoAny proof or is it a gut feeling or hot take?
- civilized 4y agoI think it's self-evident. If you disagree, feel free to do so in a more interesting way than your questions have been so far. Otherwise, it's probably best we stop here.
- kelseyfrog 4y agoThe truth of reality is that it's not self-evident. Anyone saying otherwise has an agenda. It's pretty cut and dry. Self-evidence is a form of assumption making I have no time for. Thank you.
- civilized 4y agoAny proof of all that, or is it a gut feeling or hot take?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]