3 ms·
I mean, i understand it, and i'm sure it's great for their ecosystem. I'm sure it integrates well with UI designers, etc. But i'm also really not that interest
by DannyBee 4y ago
I mean, i understand it, and i'm sure it's great for their ecosystem.
I'm sure it integrates well with UI designers, etc.
But i'm also really not that interested in using a library specific IDE at that level.
Because QT is not all i do, etc.
For folks who do, i'm sure it's great.
For C++ IDEs on linux, CLion works great. VSCode is reasonable too.
- secondcoming 4y agoI use it to build non-QT code with cmake.
- lultimouomo 4y agoQtCreator works with non-Qt, CMake based projects, has a feature set which is very competitive with CLion's and it's about a billion times faster.
- DannyBee 4y agoI get that, but that's also clearly not the market they are targeting or customers they want, etc :) Otherwise, Clion would be dead by now in favor of it!
- spacechild1 4y agoI use Qt Creator for all my C++ projects and I am not doing any Qt work.
- dekhn 4y agoNobody is forcing you to use their IDE. Just use VSCode. Also, for your complaint about the size of the SDK: most people download the Python bindings (often through conda) and don't do compilation at all (I write interactive applications using QtPy, python slowness isn't an issue). But also: you're not the target audience.