4 ms·
Or when it becomes acceptable to make them 100x faster by not using JS, but that's even less likely to happen :)
by Arnavion 4y ago
Or when it becomes acceptable to make them 100x faster by not using JS, but that's even less likely to happen :)
- kevingadd 4y agoNo JIT also rules out most modern uses of Java and C#, along with things like LuaJIT.
- Arnavion 4y ago>>>c'mon, will we ever stop using JIT in browsers?
- xboxnolifes 4y agoNot using JS means you need to replace it with something, which means you gotta put it into the browser.
- netr0ute 4y agoWho says we need JS?
- xboxnolifes 4y agoNobody? That's why the word replace is there?
- Dylan16807 4y agoLuaJIT has a very good interpreter too. You could still use it in a lot of places.
- xdfgh1112 4y agoThe JavaScript JIT is much more complex due to guessing whether a number is int or floating point or if a prototype is a class etc.