3 ms·
> you can predict success to some extent based purely on people's yearbook photos It's already shown that facial attractiveness can predict athletic prowess:
by WithinReason 4y ago
> you can predict success to some extent based purely on people's yearbook photos
It's already shown that facial attractiveness can predict athletic prowess:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704918801369 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704918801369
So it's likely that people's abilities can influence their appearance. There was a lot of evolutionary pressure to develop abilities to judge people based on appearance, so we would expect humans to be really good at it.
- ethanbond 4y agoThis result isn’t surprising at all though, compared to financial success. Obviously athleticism would be physically visible on the face (and probably be considered more attractive).
- petesergeant 4y ago> Obviously athleticism would be physically visible on the face It what now? What athleticism cues other than body-fat are you getting from a face?
- im3w1l 4y agoTestosterone is also visible. But it seems it's not necessarily a positive for attraction? https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.22.453412v1.full https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.22.453412v1....
- barry-cotter 4y agoTestosterone levels. I know a cleft chin develops with high T. I’m sure there are other more subtle diagnostic traits. Probably more stereotypically masculine traits like heavy brow ridges.
- WithinReason 4y agoTestosterone could also predict success in life based on yearbook photos, so we come full circle.
- ethanbond 4y agoWhy would you suppose a person needs more cues than body fat to see a difference? Seems perfectly sufficient on its own.
- petesergeant 4y agoBecause I think Vitalik Buterin probably has low athleticism and I think Ben Tameifuna probably has high athleticism, and a headshot of the former could be a school's star cross-country runner where the latter could be the school's star beer drinker.
- ethanbond 4y ago"Sufficient to explain a correlation" does not mean "tails do not exist on the distribution." Pro athletes are also a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the world's athletic population.
- layer8 4y agoBe careful though, it’s easy to slide into pseudoscience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiognomy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiognomy