The article says there is no criminal case and nobody went to prison. That's weird, right? You've got enough evidence to seize their money, just not enough to

The article says there is no criminal case and nobody went to prison. That's weird, right? You've got enough evidence to seize their money, just not enough to prove they committed a crime in court. The company, which has already gone out of business, pleads guilty giving up their right to appeal, which wouldn't help them because they are already out of business, and agrees to a fine, which they can't pay anyway. I think it's much more likely the company plead out to get the legal case over with. That nobody was convicted of a crime over this is why I wrote the FBI incorrectly accused the company. If the FBI was right, and these were money launderers - where are the criminal charges? The FBI and US attorneys are well and widely known for over charging and coercing people to take pleas - so the guilty plea with no consequences doesn't really carry any weight. What's the evidence?