3 ms·

copyright doesn't apply. Nothing was copied. The AI was trained in the same way you trained your brain when you look at something. Nothing is copied. Nothing i

• pbhjpbhj 4y ago
  When I look at something I create an image of it on my retina. When a computer "looks" it creates an image somewhere. The former is allowed, the latter comes against copyright scrutiny, things like caching images to show you a webpage have been addressed by copyright law--through precedent--and this will be similarly addressed.
  • deltasevennine 4y ago
    The image is not saved in a neural network. No identical image can be extracted from the network.
    • pbhjpbhj 4y ago
      Yes, it's a derivative that relies on use of the copyright works. You can't create a NN without using a copy of the work, so copyright applies -- there might be a Fair Use exception in USA but the outputs compete with the original creators of the works and so IMO courts are likely to rule it as non-Fair Use.
      • deltasevennine 4y ago
        >Yes, it's a derivative that relies on use of the copyright works. Almost every idea on the face of the earth is a derivative of something else. This includes ideas from a Human brain so applying such laws is inconsistent. >but the outputs compete with the original creators of the works All art competes with other art. And all art is derivative of other art other things.