5 ms·
The AI doesn't actually need the image. It needs a two dimensional array that represents the pixel values. I am sure there are some very clever ways to get arou
by strangescript 4y ago
The AI doesn't actually need the image. It needs a two dimensional array that represents the pixel values. I am sure there are some very clever ways to get around that hurdle if that is where the bar is set.
- LtWorf 4y ago> It needs a two dimensional array that represents the pixel values. That's an image… Are you saying that if I shut down the screen and the image isn't shown, I can copy it and send it around because it isn't an image but some numbers?
- pbhjpbhj 4y agoWell, if you can create the array without using the image then you're golden; but if you're not using the image then you're not training on the image. If you are using the image, then you're deriving (at least) a representation from the image. IME, limited as it is, courts don't take kindly to overly clever attempts to differentiate things from what everyone agrees they are; like 'the file isn't the image, so I can copy that', judges aren't stupid.
- r00fus 4y agoI'm curious how a "two dimensional pixel array" doesn't correspond to a picture.
- lioeters 4y agoIt's not a pirated image/film/book/music - it's just a (very long) array of numbers!