9 ms·
Eh, the current 3080 can already do 60FPS @ 4k HDR on every AAA title I've thrown at it, and that's with an mITX undervolt build (cliffing the voltage at a poin
by aseipp 4y ago
Eh, the current 3080 can already do 60FPS @ 4k HDR on every AAA title I've thrown at it, and that's with an mITX undervolt build (cliffing the voltage at a point). "60FPS @ 4k is readily achievable" has been sort of the gold standard we've been careening towards for years since displays outpaced GPUs, and we're just about there now. The raw frame difference and memory size is nice especially if you're doing compute on these cards, but these weren't holding the gaming market back, at least. So for those segments, you need some juice to go on top of things. I can see why they advertise it this way.
Personally, people say RT is a gimmick but I find it incredible on my 3080 for games that support it. In a game like Control the lighting is absolutely stunning, and even in a game like Minecraft RTX, the soft lighting and shadows are simply fantastic. (Minecraft IMO is a perfect example of how better soft shadows and realistic bounce lighting aren't just for "ultra realism" simulators.) It's already very convincing when implemented well. So I'm very happy to see continued interest here.
- TwoNineA 4y ago> the current 3080 can already do 4k @ 60FPS HDR on every AAA title I've thrown at it Have you tried CyberPunk 2077?
- aseipp 4y agoNo, but not for lack of interest. I simply upgraded from 2k res + 2080 Super to 4k res + 3080 at one point in the last year or so, but I had already beat the game by then and haven't returned to it.
- dekhn 4y agoI have- I upgraded to a 3080 Ti (from a 2080 Ti). 4k @ 60FPS with pretty much every whizz-bang feature turned on. 60fps during the benchmark.
- ianbutler 4y agoHow about in the actual game? I have a 3090 at 1440p and swing 60 a lot at maxed everything and with dlss at quality, but more often than not it sits in the 45-50 range, that said I suspect I may be CPU bottlenecked atm.
- aeyes 4y agoSo whats your DLSS settings? With a 3080 I don't get anywhere close to 60 FPS at 2k.
- dekhn 4y agoI don't enable DLSS IIRC.
- deadbunny 4y agoYet you're claiming better frame rates than a 3090 https://www.tweaktown.com/articles/10049/cyberpunk-2077-benchmarked-again-v1-update-with-built-in-benchmark/index.html#Benchmarks-4K https://www.tweaktown.com/articles/10049/cyberpunk-2077-benc...
- dekhn 4y agoThe 3080 Ti and 3090 have the same framerate on that page. I updated with a comment to show the FPS at various settings- only see 60FPS with DLSS set to Ultra Performance (all the other settings are maxxed).
- deadbunny 4y agoSo only 60fps when rendering at 720p then using AI to upscale to 4k. Definitely nowhere near 4k60. CP2077 seems to be the modern Crysis.
- dekhn 4y agoI went back to run some more benchmarks and it turns out with DLSS totally disabled, 4K is unplayable (3-6FPS). Didn't realize DLSS was contributing so much. Simply disabling raytracing at that point (so, DLSS disabled, 4K, everything else set to max but RT disabled) gets me back to 50-60FPS. So basically DLSS is compensating for RT. But disabling RT doesn't really seem to make a big difference- it still looks pretty damn nice. hard to tell.
- BonoboIO 4y agoHave you tried 2 chrome windows at the same time? ;-)
- shostack 4y agoTry MSFS in VR on ultra settings. With mostly high and ultra I'm sometimes able to get 30fps on my quest 2. Nevermind something like the Pimax 8k or upcoming 12k. That sim eats graphics cards for breakfast.
- aseipp 4y agoYeah that's fair, VR titles are still a place where GPUs need more performance. I personally have no interest in them but yes the compute needs are in general way higher. Not to mention Flight Sim is a particularly intense case...
- avrionov 4y agoThe games are going to adapt to the new cards and 3080 performance will go down with the latest and the greatest. It always happen.
- nullify88 4y agoControl was a great looking game (even on my 1080 Ti), and its art direction very unique. Another top release by Remedy.