5 ms·

At least Microsoft is internally consistent for once and and naming it after an older similar project: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Services_for_UNIX h

• gw99 4y ago
  Based on Microsoft’s ability to plan and manage product naming I think you stumbled on a coincidence there rather than actual intent.
  • e12e 4y ago
    I think the concept of "sub system" is quite integral to the NT kernel. Might have been easier if they had stolen the name from user-mode linux - which might be more suitable for wsl2 in some ways... But that was/is a quite different type of project: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User-mode_Linux https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User-mode_Linux See "Win32 environment subsystem" and "OS/2 environment subsystem" here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_of_Windows_NT https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_of_Windows_NT Then there was coLinux: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_Linux https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_Linux Maybe they should've called it LINE (after WINE)....
    • gw99 4y ago
      Yes fair point. However WSL2 is just a heavily disguised Hyper-V virtual machine with lots of weirdness around it rather than a proper NT subsystem.
      • pjmlp 4y ago
        They could change the documentation they used for WSL 1, and make people even more confused.