3 ms·

It doesn’t matter if it’s like the flu or something else entirely. That’s just a poorly articulated way of saying “it’s not so bad that it warrants the restrict

It doesn’t matter if it’s like the flu or something else entirely. That’s just a poorly articulated way of saying “it’s not so bad that it warrants the restrictions”. Restrictions are all but gone at least in Europe and society is still functional. And it would have been sans restrictions too.

i_no_can_eat 4y ago
> Restrictions are all but gone at least in Europe and society is still functional. And it would have been sans restrictions too Society was functional during the Spanish flu as well; that's really not the point. The point of the restrictions was reducing the overall number of deaths.
- lax4ever 4y ago
  Which, in the case of COVID, is not exactly a great argument for the restrictions either considering that after two years of COVID the world has experienced less than 7 million recorded deaths [0] compared to, at a minimum, after two years of the Spanish Flu we were looking at 17 million deaths (though it could be closer to 50 million) [1]. And that's with a global population that is an estimated 3-4x greater than the world population of 1918 [2] and with far easier global travel. [0]https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu [2]https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/ https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-populat...
  - SvenL 4y ago
    I don’t get that argument, reducing the number of deaths is quite a good argument regardless of previous pandemics. Also I wouldn’t compare Covid deaths with Spanish flu deaths. The access to health care and the quality of health care is totally different today than in 1918. I think it’s wrong todo such comparisons as an argument against the restriction. I could also imagine that the number of flu death went down due to restrictions (would be good to know if this is true).

i_no_can_eat 4y ago

> Restrictions are all but gone at least in Europe and society is still functional. And it would have been sans restrictions too Society was functional during the Spanish flu as well; that's really not the point. The point of the restrictions was reducing the overall number of deaths.

lax4ever 4y ago
Which, in the case of COVID, is not exactly a great argument for the restrictions either considering that after two years of COVID the world has experienced less than 7 million recorded deaths [0] compared to, at a minimum, after two years of the Spanish Flu we were looking at 17 million deaths (though it could be closer to 50 million) [1]. And that's with a global population that is an estimated 3-4x greater than the world population of 1918 [2] and with far easier global travel. [0]https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu [2]https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/ https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-populat...
- SvenL 4y ago
  I don’t get that argument, reducing the number of deaths is quite a good argument regardless of previous pandemics. Also I wouldn’t compare Covid deaths with Spanish flu deaths. The access to health care and the quality of health care is totally different today than in 1918. I think it’s wrong todo such comparisons as an argument against the restriction. I could also imagine that the number of flu death went down due to restrictions (would be good to know if this is true).