3 ms·
One idea to try to train the AI about compositionality, feed it Fox in Socks by Dr. Seuss. It's hard to understand that it would misunderstand the meaning of "
by peteradio 4y ago
One idea to try to train the AI about compositionality, feed it Fox in Socks by Dr. Seuss. It's hard to understand that it would misunderstand the meaning of "on" or "in" or "under" when there are such nice illustrations. I've got tons of great ideas and I'm open for hire!
- birdyrooster 4y agoTrain AI models, not children!
- dekhn 4y agois there a difference? I had kids and they were the best machine learnign systems I've worked with.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- goatlover 4y agoYeah, AI models aren't people, with all the moral and emotional considerations that go with that. I never understood taking machine/biology metaphors literally, but compsci people seem to love it.
- birdyrooster 4y agoI think the compsci people love it because of some autistic sense of "I UNDERSTAND PEOPLE NOW".
- philbo 4y agoChildren learn by imitation, but they also learn by going to school and receiving directed lessons about specific topics. To me, machine learning seems like the imitation part without the going-to-school part.
- tsimionescu 4y agoIt's also notable that individual children learn from tens of orders of magnitude less examples (typically 1-10 examples for a child to learn a word). It may well be that at the evolutionary level we have learned as slowly as AI training, but that's much harder to say.
- dekhn 4y agoyou left out unsupervised clustering, which humans are excellent at.
- version_five 4y agoThis is such a good idea, someone please try this if you're set up to make it happen easily. Starting with fox on Knox and Knox in box and moving up to a tweedle beetle battle in a puddle in a bottle and the bottles on a poodle and the poodles eating noodles... I dont see any evidence any of these models will draw it correctly, but would love to see what it produces.