4 ms·
Nope. Firefox got up to speed really fast, and security should never be used to describe a browser that is inherently spyware ( _do you even have a clue about w
by sam_goody 4y ago
Nope. Firefox got up to speed really fast, and security should never be used to describe a browser that is inherently spyware ( _do you even have a clue about what the browser is sending home?[1]_ ).
Playing dirty [eg. purposely changing Youtube to not work with the standards adhered to to by FF], making promises that they never filled and lots of aggressive marketing is the only reason that they achieved dominance.
[1]: https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/blob/master/domain_substitution.list https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/blo...
That's the list of unique divisions that Chrome sends to, but don't forget that they send which page you went to, how long you stayed on the page, your passwords in plaintext, etc.
- chii 4y ago> your passwords in plaintext are you sure they do that? That's a big claim, and a huge security problem.
- sam_goody 4y agoI saved a password in Chrome on Android. Went home, logged into the same website from my desktop. Chrome offered to log me in. My unprofessional conclusion - Google could not have encrypted my password in a way that would have prevented them from logging in as me on another device. As an aside, I was logged into GMail on the desktop, but I couldn't recall having logged into Chrome. If correct, than once you have logged into a Google property, all is fair game on any other sites you visit.