3 ms·
C++ without the old bad things it carries for the sake of backwards compatibility. Maybe a simpler subset of the language with it's most common usage, like STL
by jokoon 4y ago
C++ without the old bad things it carries for the sake of backwards compatibility.
Maybe a simpler subset of the language with it's most common usage, like STL containers, string, etc.
And a similar syntax, I don't want want exotic things like in rust.
By the way I wonder why it's not possible to deprecate things in C++, and compile different part of a code base with either an old or a new part of the language. C++ really needs to break off backward compatibility.
- hyperswine 4y agoWhat kinds of exotic syntax, Lifetime annotations and parameterising impl Trait like in returns? Also thoughts on carbon?