2 ms·
Apple’s solution was not like Google’s. Google used AI to try to find CSAM, thus it flagged the father’s picture taken to send to a doctor. Apple’s solution w
by MBCook 4y ago
Apple’s solution was not like Google’s.
Google used AI to try to find CSAM, thus it flagged the father’s picture taken to send to a doctor.
Apple’s solution was to check against a database of known abuse images. It would not be capable of flagging a new photo someone took.
Of the two solutions Google’s may find more offenders, but it would clearly find FAR more false positives.
The only way for a false positive in the Apple system is for two unrelated images to have identical perceptual hashes (with multiple algorithms?). Plus there was no reporting until a threshold of multiple (10+) matches were found, so one false positive wouldn’t do it.
- Sirened 4y ago> Plus there was no reporting until a threshold of multiple (10+) matches were found, so one false positive wouldn’t do it Not even that, the photos were not visible to some trusted human party until 10+ matches were found. That is, photos were not auto reported, they were only decryptable after the threshold was crossed and then they are reported after being reviewed by a human