4 ms·

I'm no fan of Facebook or Lockheed Martin, but that doesn't seem fair to me.

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• p_l 4y ago
  Facebook is another thing entirely, but I would easily complain about Lockheed-Martin failing acting in public interest when said public interest involves development of weapons of war and supporting tools...
  • tgv 4y ago
    Everybody loves defense, though. As said in another comment: it's too vague. When even strict rules can be bent, vague rules don't mean anything. (hit save too early): but that's thinking legally. As an inspiration, a way of seeing the world and your work, as a moral guide, it can help. And some people really should wonder if they have taken the right path.
    • p_l 4y ago
      See, I didn't say the amoral wrong thing was the defence part. But failing at it :V (whether through milking the public coffers, doing unethical things to further arms sales, etc. - making tools to defend oneself is not that morally bad)