3 ms·
> So turning down 10mil to earn 3mil is indeed a sacrifice. Agree whole-heartedly. I'm all for reducing exec pay and wage disparity, but still... let's give p
by patcon 4y ago
> So turning down 10mil to earn 3mil is indeed a sacrifice.
Agree whole-heartedly.
I'm all for reducing exec pay and wage disparity, but still... let's give ppl props when they do pro-social things. That's the moral equivalent of a talented software eng opting to take a 70% pay cut to work in non-profit or government sector instead of private sector. The majority of ppl reading and judging are doing no such thing
- pessimizer 4y agoTaking money from an organization that intends to do good and riding it into the ground is sabotage, not charity. At least Marissa Mayer fixed Yahoo up long enough to pull off a sale. Firefox alternates between stagnation and self-injury.
- _8j50 4y agoFirst, I would still say yahoo was operated worse. Second, job performance has nothing to do with how much pay she accepted before even performing the job. If she is that bad they can fire her. Again, "their" money. Mozilla is not a corporation that wants to do good, it is a corporation that needs to make a profit. Which Mozilla service are you paying for? The few that coulr potentially be paid were implemented recently much to the horrir of the small number of fanboys.