30 ms·
‘Not always’. Sure, trees are enduring, nice to look at, make things cooler and might help with carbon dioxide. Let’s plant them anyway.
by tluyben2 4y ago
‘Not always’. Sure, trees are enduring, nice to look at, make things cooler and might help with carbon dioxide. Let’s plant them anyway.
- baryphonic 4y agoI found the arguments in the article rather weak. One was that trees die. True enough. But if you plant 100 trees and 10 die within ten years, that's still quite a bit of CO2 converted into O2. It may not scale so well, sure. But as far as I can tell, neither do wind & solar. Doesn't mean we shouldn't try to make the best use of them.
- soperj 4y agoNearly all the trees we plant are planted to cut down eventually.
- quixoticelixer- 4y agoEven so you still have 30-100 years of carbon sequestration.
- Floegipoky 4y agoAnd for those that die, something else will grow. I found myself thinking "they're literally missing the forest for the trees".