4 ms·
Does DCO prevent this kind of thing from happening? I think moves like this demotivated and discourages a lot of potential contributors and spreads fear. That's
by longrod 4y ago
Does DCO prevent this kind of thing from happening? I think moves like this demotivated and discourages a lot of potential contributors and spreads fear. That's not a good thing.
Imagine a contributor who's first contribution to Open Source was this project. I am not sure he'd be very happy about a move such as this (or maybe he won't care).
- Reitet00 4y agoNot having CLA or equivalent prevents this kind of thing. DCO is for projects that want minimal legal process without copyright assignment. For the record akka has CLA.
- fweimer 4y agoCLA is sort of neutral in this regard. You can have DCO-style CLAs with incoming == outgoing licensing, where the contributor and the project organization end up with the same rights. But like with DCO, switching to proprietary is still possible in principle if the license is sufficiently permissive. And admittedly, such symmetric CLAs are somewhat rare; DCO has mostly taken over this space.