https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4586 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4586 No mention of the fact that this study mixes data tha

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4586 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4586 No mention of the fact that this study mixes data that was conducted prior to the pandemic with data collected during the height of the pandemic. Casually, it associates a small tax with TREMENDOUS reduction? > Bleich et al. (2021) similarly found a 42% decrease (6.1 fL oz decrease) in purchases of taxed beverages in Philadelphia > found Philadelphia experienced a far larger decline than the other four cities using a consumer panel from the marketing firm Infoscout. > In Philadelphia, Zhong et al. (2018) used a phone survey and found that within 2 months of the tax's implementation This is bad science, even when it's only a meta-analysis (which necessarily has a lower bar).