6 ms·
anyone can suggest a great openwrt compatible router in sub 50$ category?
by merpkz 4y ago
anyone can suggest a great openwrt compatible router in sub 50$ category?
- moondev 4y agoPlenty of options here. I have a few and have no complaints. https://www.gl-inet.com/products/ https://www.gl-inet.com/products/
- 3np 4y agoI do as well but have a few complaints ;) glinet ship their own builds of a forked openwrt (most based on 19.x) containing proprietary patches and binaries. I got a handful of their most recent devices as of last year and all of those are officially still stuck on an ancient 19.x with several security issues that are fixed in upstream but don't make it down. Got the GL-MT1300 working with a self-built open-source OpenWrt 21.something pretty straightforward but the E750 has been nothing but trouble, weird bugs and unreliability as soon as I try anything except light tweaks of the out-of-box experience. The last thing on the E750 is that my self-built firmware will initially work fine but at some point (and all subsequent boots after), there is not way to get network access either via wired or wifi, despite the OLED indicating everything's as it should. It's in the drawer waiting for me to figure out how to get serial working to debug it as a full factory reset is the only way to recover otherwise and I replicated the issue a few times already. This is all after several hours of trying to dig apart their convoluted github org to figure out how the builds are made and where the code comes from in the first place. I'd be really surprise if there will ever be anything 22.03-compatible for any of their current devices given all the iptables voodo in their custom scripts... Given the combination of poorly maintained official images, inconsistent compatibility with open source upstream, and no way to reproduce their builds, I'd say these can be fun little toys if your use-case perfectly matches the out-of-box provided features but sadly enough you should seriously consider and test each model individually before relying on it for production use even just personally. At least until public progress is made on some of that.
- copirate 4y agoThey list[1] which device supports an official OpenWRT, but the E750 you mention is in this list for version ">21.02" without any remarks. So this list is not accurate? [1] https://github.com/gl-inet/openwrt#product-branch-relationship-table https://github.com/gl-inet/openwrt#product-branch-relationsh...
- 3np 4y agoIME yes, inaccurate. I have previously compiled OpenWRT for a wide range of devices from manufacturers with no official support and spotty community coverage so it's not like I'm not used to things like this. There's some talk about the issues with the E750 drivers/firmware on the openwrt forums or mailing list IIRC. This should give an idea of how much much attention they pay to security updates and the response one can expect when opening issues or PRs on their repos: https://github.com/gl-inet/gli-pub/pull/1 https://github.com/gl-inet/gli-pub/pull/1
- suprjami 4y ago> glinet ship their own builds of a forked openwrt Imma let you finish, but you've always been able to install vanilla OpenWrt on GL.iNet devices. I've been doing this for years across most models. Actually there are only a couple of recent GL.iNet routers that I don't own.
- owly 4y agoDo you know if GL-AX1800 can be flashed with openwrt? Not on official device list.
- suprjami 4y agoA quick search suggests this device uses a new target (`ipq807x`) not yet in owrt official builds. This post details a community firmware with images: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/gl-inet-ax1800-new-router-openwrt-support/105163/105 https://forum.openwrt.org/t/gl-inet-ax1800-new-router-openwr... That community repo is a fork of the GL.iNet build infrastructure repo, just with less definitions that allow compilation to succeed. My understanding is that infrastructure fetches the official owrt sources and applies the patches listed in the yaml files, but I didn't audit the entire build system in 15 minutes :P
- neilv 4y agoFor quantity one/few, eBay shows that used Netgear R7800 has sometimes sold recently for about $50 shipped (but it can also sell for around $100). It has decent specs, and OpenWrt on it works well for me. https://openwrt.org/toh/netgear/r7800 https://openwrt.org/toh/netgear/r7800
- c0l0 4y agoSince you specify US$, I'm assuming you are based in the US. Walmart had special offers of the at the moment probably best-suited OpenWrt device there is only a few days ago, where they sold the Belkin RT3200/Linksys E8450 for 60US$. If you can get that, it's definitely worth the 10US$ premium. Check https://forum.openwrt.org/t/belkin-rt3200-currently-60-at-walmart/135661 https://forum.openwrt.org/t/belkin-rt3200-currently-60-at-wa... for pointers.
- dehrmann 4y agoMost Mikrotik hardware is compatible and decent. I used to recommend Ubiquiti, but...
- saidinesh5 4y agoBut...?
- ikiris 4y agobut they're determined to run their company into a wall chasing people who want dumb guis instead of their basically abandoned uniquely awesome edgerouter series that isnt really matched in terms of consumer performance.
- bubblethink 4y agoWhat does it matter what they do with their OS ? That's their OS to ruin. Making a crap OS is the rite of passage for every hardware vendor. The whole reason for running openwrt is to replace the vendor's OS. As long as they don't lock bootloaders, hardware is judged based on upstream support, and ER-X is perfectly fine.
- petre 4y agoI've had a terrible experience with the edgeruter. The hardware is capable but the default firmware is very a pain to use.
- sofixa 4y agoBesides their very dubious product strategy which consists of shipping the org chart, which with the apparently high turnover results in multiple competing but basically abandoned product lines.. There's the security issues. If their AWS infra for their cloud services is that shit (as was revealed by a hack by an internal person), i doubt security is taken seriously in the org in general. Not to mention them suing security reporters. Unlike their sometimes dubious hardware QA, it doesn't impact you that much if you plan on flashing your own firmware on their hardware, but still, those are kind of turnoffs. Hardware quality seems to vary somewhat, but is mostly decent.
- jabl 4y agoTo handle bufferbloat (too large buffers without queue management causing long latencies) pick a router based on ath9k, ath10k, or mt76 wifi chips. Those are not the most common ones, and might take a slight amount of effort to match what's available in your local gear store, the above chips, and the openwrt table of supported hardware at https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_extended_all https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_extended_all (Personally I have an ath10k based ZyXEL NBG6817 (product name is "Armor Z2") which I'm happy with. But it was a few years ago I bought it, don't know if it's still on the market. Also still running the previous openwrt 21.02, haven't yet upgraded.)
- bubblethink 4y agoFor that budget, the wifi is likely going to be subpar. Get a wired router and manage your AP separately. Ubiquiti ER-X and ER-X SFP are decent wired routers in the sub $50 bracket, covid price gouging notwithstanding.
- nisa 4y agoif you want to solder and be on the cutting edge - mt7622 is really fast (based on arm-cortex so it's magnitudes faster than other wifi routers - wireguard is also a lot faster, reaching gigabit speeds) - xiaomi ax3200 for example is near sub <50$ https://openwrt.org/toh/xiaomi/ax3200 https://openwrt.org/toh/xiaomi/ax3200 - how to flash via serial console: https://github.com/mikeeq/xiaomi_ax3200_openwrt https://github.com/mikeeq/xiaomi_ax3200_openwrt one caveat at the moment: 802.11ax is? was unstable.
- Glent20 4y agoI got two for 48€ eatch, Euro now is cheaper than dollar so its sub 50$ for sure. Flashed and using it, its a great/cheap router for home. Really speedy, using it with Wireguard on the entire network, perfect really
- ncmncm 4y agoSomebody was saying mt762x has a long-standing squashfs bug ...