4 ms·
Why not other metrics? For example why exclude LGBT people despite centuries of oppression and extermination in every aspect of life at all levels of society, c
by gurumeditations 4y ago
Why not other metrics? For example why exclude LGBT people despite centuries of oppression and extermination in every aspect of life at all levels of society, continuing as we speak?
Probably because overwhelmingly straight people made this law. But only certain biases get special treatment. This is a problem with these kinds of rules privileging certain groups in the name of equality. Inevitably other groups who deserve ‘reparation’ will ask, why not me too?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> why exclude LGBT people The history of state-mandated lists of gay people cautions against this impulse.
- throw_m239339 4y ago> Why not other metrics? For example why exclude LGBT people despite centuries of oppression and extermination in every aspect of life at all levels of society, continuing as we speak? Does that list has to single out Jews when it comes to race as well? What's even an individual's race? Some label the Californian society imposes on individuals or what the individual claims they" identify" as to begin with? Who decides the race of their employees? the employer? Will employees have to disclose it to their employer? Same with sexual orientation, would employees have to come out to their employer in order to make such list? These laws are inane.
- Ferrotin 4y agoAll LGBT people are descended from straight people, so there is no reparation factor.
- eurasiantiger 4y agoYou cannot know that.
- no-dr-onboard 4y ago> But only certain biases get special treatment. This is a problem with these kinds of rules privileging certain groups in the name of equality. Arguing for LGBT persons in the first half of your comment and then continuing with this is intensely ironic to the point of myself being unsure if that’s actually what you intended.