8 ms·

For everyone about to comment on the garbage in the commit: It looks like the committer made their changes in the top commit, then merged the updated CompViz S

For everyone about to comment on the garbage in the commit: It looks like the committer made their changes in the top commit, then merged the updated CompViz StableDiffusion change set on top of it for some reason. That's where the license change, rick astley image, etc come from. And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. Here's the code that does it: https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/blob/main/scripts/txt2img.py#L79 https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/blob/main/script... And here's what it looks like: https://twitter.com/qDot/status/1565076751465648128 https://twitter.com/qDot/status/1565076751465648128

NHQ 4y ago
But what is the correct git command to ignore all that?
- cercatrova 4y ago
  There's no git command to ignore it, the main repo should merge their changes and then the other person can make a PR on the updated changes.
  - NHQ 4y ago
    Where are PRs in Git?
- oefrha 4y ago
  Do a git-cherry-pick.
p-e-w 4y ago
> And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. It goes without saying that the authors of a piece of software have the right to make the software do whatever they want, but that shouldn't stop us from recognizing that AI engineers are starting to act like megalomaniac overseers who consider it part of their mission to steer humanity onto the "right" path. Who exactly do these people think they are? Imagine this behavior from a web browser. "The URL of the file you were trying to download triggered my NSFW classifier, so I'm going to replace the file with this funny image." This isn't funny, it's creepy.
- esjeon 4y ago
  Yeah, but, when it comes to generating NSFW contents, it is illegal to distribute pornographic software in some countries, and doing so can lead to domain blockage and such (i.e. South Korea, believe or not). This is something you gotta understand. Also, if the author wanted to block NSFW contents at all, I'm pretty sure one can actually make the filter inseparable from the main network. This isn't the case here AFAIK.
  - p-e-w 4y ago
    That makes no sense. You can draw whatever you like with Photoshop. You can search for whatever you want on Google. That doesn't make the software "NSFW", and no country will block Photoshop's domain just because someone used Photoshop to create NSFW content. Don't let people who are clearly motivated by a moralistic desire to control others hide behind BS pseudo-legal excuses.
    - manmal 4y ago
      Explain this to insert regime when they block your GitHub repo or make using your software a felony. You are proposing to act on ideology, while such mitigations are rooted in pragmatism. You often can’t have both.
    - esjeon 4y ago
      1. Google do have a stuff called "SafeSearch"[1] to filter explicit contents, and they do have a DMCA-like system for processing violation reports from governments and legal entities. That is, Google is already cooperating. 2. Photoshop's sole function is to let people draw, so drawing a porn w/ Photoshop is 100% users' responsibility. In case of image generators, the AI itself has the capabilities to create NSFW contents. If you're talking about the interactive nature of "prompt", that logic also makes any adult games SFW - they are safe until the user clicks something. [1]: https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/510 https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/510
    - the-rc 4y ago
      You'd be right about Photoshop, but... https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/cds.html https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/cds.html
aortega 4y ago
>StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. Just replace in scripts/txt2img.py: - x_checked_image, has_nsfw_concept = check_safety(x_samples_ddim) + x_checked_image = x_samples_ddim And be done with it.
- rrobukef 4y ago
  And you save some more RAM too!
  - terafo 4y ago
    You don't since model is loaded earlier in the script.
    - aortega 4y ago
      You can comment those lines too.

NHQ 4y ago

But what is the correct git command to ignore all that?

cercatrova 4y ago
There's no git command to ignore it, the main repo should merge their changes and then the other person can make a PR on the updated changes.
- NHQ 4y ago
  Where are PRs in Git?
oefrha 4y ago
Do a git-cherry-pick.

p-e-w 4y ago

> And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. It goes without saying that the authors of a piece of software have the right to make the software do whatever they want, but that shouldn't stop us from recognizing that AI engineers are starting to act like megalomaniac overseers who consider it part of their mission to steer humanity onto the "right" path. Who exactly do these people think they are? Imagine this behavior from a web browser. "The URL of the file you were trying to download triggered my NSFW classifier, so I'm going to replace the file with this funny image." This isn't funny, it's creepy.

esjeon 4y ago
Yeah, but, when it comes to generating NSFW contents, it is illegal to distribute pornographic software in some countries, and doing so can lead to domain blockage and such (i.e. South Korea, believe or not). This is something you gotta understand. Also, if the author wanted to block NSFW contents at all, I'm pretty sure one can actually make the filter inseparable from the main network. This isn't the case here AFAIK.
- p-e-w 4y ago
  That makes no sense. You can draw whatever you like with Photoshop. You can search for whatever you want on Google. That doesn't make the software "NSFW", and no country will block Photoshop's domain just because someone used Photoshop to create NSFW content. Don't let people who are clearly motivated by a moralistic desire to control others hide behind BS pseudo-legal excuses.
  - manmal 4y ago
    Explain this to insert regime when they block your GitHub repo or make using your software a felony. You are proposing to act on ideology, while such mitigations are rooted in pragmatism. You often can’t have both.
  - esjeon 4y ago
    1. Google do have a stuff called "SafeSearch"[1] to filter explicit contents, and they do have a DMCA-like system for processing violation reports from governments and legal entities. That is, Google is already cooperating. 2. Photoshop's sole function is to let people draw, so drawing a porn w/ Photoshop is 100% users' responsibility. In case of image generators, the AI itself has the capabilities to create NSFW contents. If you're talking about the interactive nature of "prompt", that logic also makes any adult games SFW - they are safe until the user clicks something. [1]: https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/510 https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/510
  - the-rc 4y ago
    You'd be right about Photoshop, but... https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/cds.html https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/cds.html

aortega 4y ago

>StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. Just replace in scripts/txt2img.py: - x_checked_image, has_nsfw_concept = check_safety(x_samples_ddim) + x_checked_image = x_samples_ddim And be done with it.

rrobukef 4y ago
And you save some more RAM too!
- terafo 4y ago
  You don't since model is loaded earlier in the script.
  - aortega 4y ago
    You can comment those lines too.