3 ms·
Wrong. The auction was not legally conducted, there was no actual transfer of ownership, and in any case what the auction falsely represented to the buyer that
by Hizonner 4y ago
Wrong.
The auction was not legally conducted, there was no actual transfer of ownership, and in any case what the auction falsely represented to the buyer that it had the right to sell was some meat, not a goat. You are making "factual" assertions without bothering to check them.
Complaint: https://dig.abclocal.go.com/kgo/PDF/2022-08-31-Complaint.pdf https://dig.abclocal.go.com/kgo/PDF/2022-08-31-Complaint.pdf
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- vogt 4y agoNot sure why you’re repeating this comment in multiple places, but given that you are, I’ll repeat that this is not wrong, as I pointed out to you here: https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=32704877&goto=threads%3Fid%3Dvogt%2332704877 https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=32704877&goto=threads%...
- Hizonner 4y agoI'm repeating it because of the mind-boggling number of people making contrary assertions of "fact" based on nothing but how they would like things to be.
- vogt 4y agoHow many livestock auctions or 4H shows have you attended? If the answer is greater than zero, which I truly doubt, how many did not require the entrants to understand that entering your animal is putting it up for sale?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> the mind-boggling number of people making contrary assertions of "fact" based on nothing but how they would like things to be A judge executed a warrant for the seizure of the animal.