3 ms·
Here's the full post, but the bad words are still redacted (which is insane to redact "evidence," leaving us to assume he used a slur, but whatever). Based on c
by gkoberger 4y ago
Here's the full post, but the bad words are still redacted (which is insane to redact "evidence," leaving us to assume he used a slur, but whatever). Based on context I think it's probably just a swear word, but the post doesn't make him look good. He even says this situation is "making [him] racist" and says people deserve to die.
https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/oh-lorain/judge-unseals-new-evidence-in-gibson-bakery-lawsuit-against-oberlin-college https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/oh-lorain/jud...
- dekhn 4y agonone of those dumb things he said on social media affect my opinion of the case against oberlin.
- ensignavenger 4y agoSure, I read the article. If he had used a racial slur, most media would report it something like "used the 'n-word'". They did not, and thus I can only guess he did not (or perhaps the version the media got was redacted? I can't imagine why a court would redact a bad word, racial slur or not...) This is also the grand kid of the business owners. There can be significant differences across generations of families in attitudes.