4 ms·
i'm not sure there must be something before the "@".
by bandie91 4y ago
i'm not sure there must be something before the "@".
- marcosdumay 4y agoI am certain. There must be something before the @. The @ itself is optional (I believe the RFC disagrees, but on practice it is), but if it's there, there must be something after it too. So the only really required "field" is the one before the @.
- bandie91 4y agook, i admit the rfc may prescribes something like .+(@.+)? i've just drawn the conclusion from that the local part is interpredet solely by the receiving party. that's why case-conversion should be avoided, since the receiving party may be case sensitive. so further thinking, local part can be empty perhaps, depending on the implementation.