3 ms·
Sounds like something for the courts to handle and not cloudflare. https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-moon-1 https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-moon-1
by fjordelectro 4y ago
Sounds like something for the courts to handle and not cloudflare.
https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-moon-1 https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-moon-1
- Pxtl 4y agoYou could say that about a lot of things that are normally covered by abuse policies. For example, we expect hosts to remove content that violate copyright, why is copyright more worthy of protection at the corporate level than defamation?
- howdyfolks 4y agoBecause society created laws in that way?
- nradov 4y agoThe DMCA specifically requires hosts to remove content upon an allegation of copyright infringement. There is no law requiring hosts to remove defamatory content (without a specific court order). Congress has deemed copyright protection more worthy of protection at the corporate level than defamation. If you are unhappy with that situation then you should contact your members of Congress.