> Which is what they’re saying. No, it's not. The definition they provided for DevOps was markedly different: > DevOps is [...] the outcome of applying the mo

> Which is what they’re saying. No, it's not. The definition they provided for DevOps was markedly different: > DevOps is [...] the outcome of applying the most trusted principles from the domain of physical manufacturing and leadership to the IT value stream. DevOps relies on bodies of knowledge from Lean, Theory of Constraints, the Toyota Production System, resilience engineering, learning organizations, safety culture, human factors, and many others. If somebody reads that sentence - without already having knowledge about what "DevOps" means - are they going to think "oh yes, I see, so DevOps means having the same team do both Dev and Ops work"? Of course not! They're not going to have any idea what DevOps means, other than the fact that it's something consultants sell with word soup.