I stopped after the first chapter, because to me, the likelihood of the article being true after that was too low. If you evaluate this chapter and the abstrac

I stopped after the first chapter, because to me, the likelihood of the article being true after that was too low. If you evaluate this chapter and the abstract differently than I do (let's say 50% after the abstract because your are totally open minded unlike me, and 5% after the first chapter because it's really bad but you don't have the negative prior i have), and continue, maybe what's after is more compelling. But to me, it's hogwash. Unless they write something better.