4 ms·

How do you reconcile point 1 with the fact that atheists on average have higher IQ's than non-atheists?

• wawjgreen 4y ago
  If you atheists were indeed smart you would not have felt so hurt and downvote my original comment. Also, IQ tests are rubbish (and you didn't know that--which shows your intelligence level). Among us, we look down on any work that is written by an atheist. It is the ultimate mark of low intelligence.
  • eimrine 4y ago
    would we?
    • wawjgreen 4y ago
      it is the WE that does not care for the works of an atheist because of the fundamental intelligence flaw. If YOU do, then by all means, sate your thirst for second-rate knowledge. I'd rather stand with the likes of Descartes and Leibnitz, minds vastly greater than any modern atheist's. anyone who does not have and practice a standard code of morality does not earn my respect, and should not feel hurt if I don't read their books... I am free in my choice as are atheists. I simply said I don't read their books because they are not clever. They are welcome to say to same about me. and I couldn't care less about the downvotes.
• eimrine 4y ago
  > How do you reconcile point 1 with the fact that atheists on average have higher IQ's than non-atheists? 2b point answers your question.
  • wawjgreen 4y ago
    I don't think it does. Being an atheist, you display your fine intellect for all other readers to see. 2b is a logical outcome for me, and if you think sth is wrong with it, you are implying that an atheist reads scientific works that he does not understand! ... that explains the fairy tales called big Bang, Natural Selection, and other assorted amusements.